 |
Continuing
Education
|
This
month’s installment of the
ARCHITECTURAL RECORD / AIA Continuing
Education series focuses on the problem-laden area of reroofing.
After reading the article, complete the questions and check your
answers. AIA members may fill out the self-report form and send
it in for two AIA Learning Units. —Mark Scher, AIA Director Professional
Education Products and Services
Learning
Objective:
After
reading this article, you will be able to:
1.
Identify at least 15 factors in structure
analysis, owner requirements, and building use to consider in
programming, designing, and specifying reroofing projects.
2.
Cite authoritative sources and references
for roofing information and research.
3.
Write specification solutions for environmental
problems that affect roofs and offer detailing/ specification
tips to avoid preinstallation communication problems.
| Barbara
A. Nadel, AIA, is principal of Barbara Nadel Architect in
New York City, specializing in health, correctional, and institutional
planning and design. She is New York State Regional Director
on the national AIA Board of Directors. |
|
Much of the
time, reroofing is a contractor's job. But an architect may be
called in when a roof presents persistent problems or when reroofing
becomes part of a larger renovation project. After a flurry of
new membrane types were introduced in the 1980s, technological
change has settled down, and most roofing technologies in common
use now have a track record. This does not mean roofs are problem-free.
They remain vulnerable to poor design, poor installation practice,
and poor maintenance. More claims are filed each year regarding
roof and wall systems than any other part of a building, according
to a recent survey by liability insurer DPIC.
Retrofit roofs
are not the same as roofs designed for new buildings. Undocumented
existing conditions (such as a rooftop addition) may have been
in place for a while and may be contributing to deterioration.
Unforeseen environ- mental factors (perhaps grease from an added
fan) and lack of maintenance may also shorten roof life.
Why did
the old roof fail?
Most of the
time, however, an architect is called in when the old roof leaks.
A split or hole in the membrane may be an obvious cause, but for
many roofs, finding the source of leakage is a tricky yet essential
step toward getting the designed performance out of the new roof.
When faced
with a roofing retrofit project, the two most important reroofing
questions an architect should ask are why the original roof failed
and why the building leaked. "Roofing professionals recognize
that most failures occur at penetrations, substrate and material
transitions, base flashings, and termination details,'' says Ken
Bensimon, AIA, principal of KMB Architects in Olympia, Washington.
"Incompatible materials may cause a reaction adversely affecting
waterproof capabilities,'' he continues, such as a metal flashing
to which a thermoplastic membrane won't adhere. He also explains
that roofing commonly fails where penetrations are not detailed
to account for building movement. A building may expand and contract
or even permanently "grow'' due to changing temperatures
and positive air pressure.
Jan Kalas,
AIA, an associate at LZA Technology in New York City, frequently
examines defective roofing systems for the forensic-investigations
arm of LZA, a large engineering firm, to determine whether to
restore, repair, or replace them. An existing-conditions assessment
should not only evaluate the condition of the membrane but also
identify any trapped wet materials and the source of leaks. Signs
to look for include blistering and delamination of the roofing
membrane, leaks, moisture and stains in spaces below the roof
(such as on ceiling tiles), rips and holes in roofing or flashing,
ponding water, and moss or other plant growth. If a spongy, uneven
surface or water bubbling out of the membrane is encountered while
walking on the roof, more detailed analysis is needed.
"Roofing
is only as good as what's underneath itthe deck, substrate,
and attachments between the roofing and the structural system,''
says Kalas. "Roofing leaks can damage the substrate and structure.
Moisture infiltration can lead to indoor air quality problems
caused by mold, bacteria, stagnant air, and standing water.''
Kalas usually
follows visual observation with testing. Non-destructive testing
includes infrared photography or nuclear scanning for moisture
content. If such testing or observation suggests that roofing
or substrate materials are wet, destructive testing may be needed.
Destructive testing requires cutting into the roof and taking
a piece out for analysis. This core sampling indicates the condition
of the roofing, insulation, and subsurface deck.
For example,
if a roof with a steel deck, perlite insulation, and a membrane
over it has leaked and the insulation is wet, the insulation must
be removed. This is critical because the deck will continue to
rust, the metal fasteners for the replacement roof will corrode,
and the new membrane will probably blister. The roof may not rest
on a firm substrate, making it subject to premature wear or puncture.
One of the
key decisions the designer must make is whether a new roof can
be applied over the old roof or whether conditions warrant a "tear-off.''
The structural condition of the underlying roof deck to a great
extent determines the answer, says Jack Robinson, the technical
services deputy director of the National Roofing Contractors Association
in Rosemont, Illinois. New roofs add weight that might not have
been anticipated in design, for example. "Inspect the underside
of the roof deck to see if the existing structure is damaged,''
says Robinson. "Look for signs of rust in steel decks, rot
in wood, or spalling in concrete. If there is damage, you need
to repair or replace the decking first, which can mean a tear-off
rather than a re-cover.'' He also advises making sure no conduit
runs above or below the roof deck in channels to avoid penetrating
the conduit with new roofing fasteners.
A reroofing
may involve improving earlier, unfortunate design decisions. When
dealing with retrofits, says Kevin Cash, associate at Simpson
Gumpertz & Heger, Inc., in Arlington, Massachusetts, a consulting
firm that specializes in building-envelope design, check the existing
roof-drain system, especially in buildings more than 15 years
old that may not have been sized to modern standards. If the existing
system and roof drains are undersize, it may be necessary to substantially
upgrade or replace the entire drainage system to current codes.
In such instances, coordination with local building officials
may be required. Drains may also have been placed too close to
walls and parapets, where water can be trapped or where there
is insufficient space for the roofer to flash them properly.
"Skylights
are often placed over the interior construction and not where
the roof wants them,'' Cash explains. Skylights and other interruptions
in roof slope require crickets on the up-slope side to divert
runoff. An older building may have accumulated a junkyard of conduits,
pipes, and mechanical equipment, all of which can cause leaks
and make reroofing nigASParish. Part of the reroofing analysis
includes considering which of these items can be removed or relocated.
Recently,
roof-mounted antennae for cellular phones have proliferated. Although
cellular antennae are said to generate harmful micro- waves and
extensive exposure may pose a health risk, more owners are adding
them to roofs and facades because they generate income. "These
antennae must be placed at a roof high point, where water is unlikely
to collect, not at a low point, where water will inevitably find
its way into the building,'' cautions Peter Blaufeux, AIA, principal
of Peter Blaufeux AIA Architects in New York City, who specializes
in building exteriors and institutional work. Installing any rooftop
items after roof completion and inspection may also void a warranty.
The National
Roofing Contractors Association (NRCA) offers a great deal of
guidance on various commercial roofing systems (the association
can be reached at 847/299-9070). The NRCA fields more than 4,000
calls annually from architects, engineers, attorneys, contractors,
and homeowners asking for roofing advice and contractor referrals.
It publishes a roofing manual, roofing-material guides, and the
Handbook of Accepted Roofing Knowledge (HARK). The NRCA also publishes
more than 300 detail drawings on low-slope roofing on CD-ROM and
for CAD systems, and maintains Project Pinpoint, a program identifying
roofing problems and solutions using new technology.
Selecting
a reroofing system
Kalas decides
on a reroofing approach by balancing installation and life- cycle
costs, energy-conservation performance, and the degree of protection
the owner wants to maintain. He develops strategies with options
for roofing systems and cost estimates for each alternative.
When choosing
roofing systems, architects should consider the building use and
the client's financial circumstances. [See "Simplifying Single-Ply
Roofs,'' RECORD, February 1995, pages 38-29, for an overview of
standard roofing types.] Developers generally want low first cost,
even if maintenance levels may be higher or replacement will loom
sooner. Institutional clients can often pay incrementally more
for a roof if there is a return in longevity and lower maintenance.
(Metal-roofing manufacturers have successfully made a low-maintenance
case for retrofitting metal roofs on a sloped purlin system over
older roof systems with nearly flat built-up or single-ply roofs.)
Many large owners choose a roof system because it has a proven
track record for them and because it is easier to maintain a great
number of buildings that have the same roof.
A competent
roof designer will design a system suited to environmental and
site-specific conditionssuch as rooftop exposure to chemicals,
falling debris, interior exposure to fumes, extreme winds, or
a marine climateand will evaluate potential or existing
roof problems that may go beyond the scope of roofing itself.
These might include structural modifications, thermal-insulation
improvements, improved thermal-movement or seismic-movement control,
and better handling of roof or attic ventilation, as well as upgrades
to bring the structure up to code and design to reduce needed
maintenance.
Building use
also affects roof selection. "Buildings housing electronics,
computers, and telephone equipment are highly susceptible to water
damage,'' advises Roland Frerking, AIA, vice president at HNTB
Corp. Facilities Consulting in Kansas City, Missouri, who specializes
in roofing design. In such cases, the roof must offer absolute
protection. A less expensive, low-maintenance roof might be fine
for a warehouse storing farm implements, however.
Some building
types present unexpected issues. Dormitory roofs covered in synthetic-rubber
membranes can suffer deterioration due to kitchen-exhaust grease
or oils used by sunbathing students. Buildings under an airport
landing path may be subjected to soot and exhaust fumes that can
interact chemically with some membrane types. Loose-laid membrane
systems and poorly detailed metal roofs have proven particularly
susceptible to gales, and slates or tiles torn off in high winds
have become dangerous projectiles. In waterfront areas, seagulls
may be attracted to polyurethane-foam roofing and have been known
to peck at and build nests on sprayed-urethane decks. Preventive
coatings are available.
Many products
appear on the market for new and retrofit applications. Using
new technology can pose a risk, because problematic field conditions
may not appear immediately. "A roof is no place to experiment,''
advises Blaufeux. "I'll wait for the glitches to be worked
out. I want a proven track record.''
Design and
detailing issues
Reroofings
should be designed, not merely specified, Bensimon asserts. "A
roofing contractor may recommend a system they are authorized
to install, rather than one that may be more cost-efficient, such
as a system with the proper material and wind-uplift requirements,''
he says. Details are a sore point for many contractors, NRCA's
Robinson says. "Most contractors see drawings that are inadequately
detailed and contain too many 'RFOs' (roofer figure out) and such
blanket responsibility-shifting phrases as 'Shall conform to the
recommendations of the NRCA Roofing and Waterproofing Manual.'''
The manual is 1,900 pages, Robinson explains. "Can't they
narrow it down to one chapter?''
"It's
refreshing to get a call from an architect asking about a detail
for an expansion joint running into a wall. That's a classic RFO,''
Robinson adds. "Architects basically tell contractors, 'Don't
do it right' or 'Do it over at your cost.' We'll comment and mark
up an architect's sketch and provide related information.''
"Manufacturers'
details are good but generic,'' LZA's Kalas adds. "Standard
details should be made project-specific. Roofing design errors
also occur when the designer fails to understand the roof as an
entire system consisting of membrane, flashing and terminations,
insulation, vapor barrier (if needed), decking, and the roof-support
structure.''
Contractor
selection
Since improper
installations are much more common than material failures, the
selection of the roofing installer is a critical decision. The
contractor's roofing experience should be verified and the company
should be a member of the NRCA. "The NRCA list is a good
place to start,'' says Simpson Gumpertz & Heger's Cash. He
also advises,
"Choose
roofers from among those certified by the roofing manufacturer
for installation, not just the ones who buy the materials.'' As
you narrow the list, ask for references and check them, says Cash,
and check the roofer's financial state (its Dun & Bradstreet
rating) and its safety programs. Then call the contractor and
make sure they can handle your specific installation. "Ask
who their best competitors are,'' says Cash. "Put them on
the bid list.'' Cash continues, "It's good to know a contractor's
specialty. Certain roofing systems are more common in some parts
of the country and will be more competitively priced by the contractor.''
Solving
problems before construction
Blaufeux is
among those who stress the value of a preconstruction conference.
"Drawings are no guarantee you'll get what you designed,''
he explains. Meeting attendees should include at least representatives
from the owner, architect, roofing contractor, and roofing-system
manufacturer. Other affected subcontractors or consultants (environmental
and structural, for example) should be included. The meeting gives
parties a chance to resolve questions about documents and existing
conditions rather than having to solve them on the roof while
bitumen kettles are bubbling, rain is threatening, or seams are
curing.
Assuring
installation quality
Much can go
wrong with a roofing installation, and experts identify some common
problem areas.
Existing conditions.
Before new materials go on, it is important to inspect areas that
will be hidden when roofing is complete, says Blaufeux. "Architects
should discuss the possibilities with their clients in advance
of construction. Let them know that some conditions needing further
attention can't be determined in advance, such as clogged drains.''
Materials
storage. "A wet blanket doesn't insulate very well,'' Blaufeux
observes. "Roofing materials must be stored dry.''
Timing and
crew changes. How the partially completed roof is protected at
the end of the day or when a sudden storm threatens is key to
performance. Protection not only has to enclose the new material,
it has to keep water out of the exposed or unrepaired old roof.
A crew change can result in a lapse of quality control, Frerking
says, if the contractor is not paying close attention or a designer
or inspector is not present.
Craftsmanship.
Single-ply roofing materials, including EPDM, PVC and PVC blends,
CSPE, and TPO, depend on essentially perfect field seams, which
are lapped and glued or solvent-welded. The multiple plies of
built-up roofs offer some redundancy if craftsmanship is not up
to par.
Because quality
control and workmanship are so important to modern roof systems,
Frerking recommends that his clients retain an on-site observer
during roofing installation. It's an expense many clients don't
want to bear and an inconvenience for contractors, but the consequences
of premature roof failure may be worse. Manufacturers are supposed
to inspect the work of their certified installers before signing
off on a warranty, but Blaufeux contends that the inspection often
doesn't occur until the installation is completed, when it is
too late.
An independent
inspector is most important in observing the installation of materials
and components that will ultimately be hidden, such as insulation,
flashing, or vapor barriers. Inspectors may not be empowered to
stop the work (it's a job often outsourced to an experienced third
party), but they can put the roofer and general contractor on
notice that apparently nonconforming procedures may compromise
the roof, and get the designer and roofer together in a timely
way to resolve unexpected problems. Observers pay for themselves
when they help prevent the roofer from removing improper work
and doing it over again. Cash has developed an extensive checklist,
used for training, with more than 24 items and reminders for roofing
installation and quality control.
Blaufeux recommends
requiring the roofing contractor to inspect the roof twice under
the one-year guarantee usually called for in general-construction
contracts and to issue a written report documenting observed conditions.
The architect should inspect the roof a few months prior to expiration
of the contractor's agreement to determine if any defective work
needs to be corrected under the guarantee. Documen-tation should
include written records and dated photos of flashing, seams, and
other key areas.
Are warranties
worth it?
As manufacturers
have offered longer and longer warranties, owners have come to
think of them as taking care of any problem. "They don't
preclude the need for maintenance,'' explains Robinson; in fact,
many are voided if prescribed maintenance is not performed. Warranties
usually come in two types: materials only, which covers only defects
in the membrane and related materials, and a system warranty,
which covers defects in the material and installation of the roof
membrane and related items supplied by the roofing manufacturer.
Such warranties are useful because deficiencies are not always
immediately obvious, explains Blaufeux. "The glue doesn't
always hold. Adhesives and sealants may blister and form bubbles,
but you may not see them until the sun beats down in spring and
summer.''
"A maintenance
agreement provides a better value,'' says Robinson. "Most
people are better off without a warranty.''Some companies issuing
10-year warranties haven't been around for 10 years or lack the
assets to back them up, for example.
"A warranty
is a piece of paper that doesn't keep water out,'' says Cash.
"The typical manufacturer's warranty is not written to serve
the owner but to limit the exposure of the manufacturer,'' adds
Robinson. "Warranties rarely cover related damage,'' he says,
such as damage to insulation or roof decks. Some manufacturers'
warranties limit liability to cost of material replacement only,
excluding labor and related materials, or to costs at the time
of initial installation, without allowing for inflation. If owners
do not choose a warranty, they may have to sue for relief, if,
for instance, a loss of business occurs due to a faulty membrane
leaking into the interior. HNTB's Frerking observes: "A warranty
is like an insurance policy; you should design a roof so you never
have to use it. Most warranties help sell a product and aren't
worth it.''
Maintenance
agreements represent an ongoing cost, but the owner is assured
of timely recognition of problems. According to the NRCA's Robinson,
a maintenance agreement should include a twice-yearly roof inspection,
roof maintenance work, and a schedule of what is to be inspected.
Typical maintenance should include cleaning out drains, gutters,
and scuppers; checking for proper roof drainage; repairing any
minor flashing damage; replacing gravel or ballast where it has
scoured; renewing coatings on flashings; checking for damage by
other trades, such as repairs to rooftop HVAC systems; and checking
flashing near roof penetrations, where leaks often first appear.
Manufacturers
have increasingly stressed regular roof inspections and attention
to maintenance, but most owners still don't visit the roof unless
there is a problem, experts agree. But they also say a preventive-maintenance
program is the best way to ensure roofing longevity. Once- or
twice-yearly inspections are sufficient for most buildings, but
more frequent checks are warranted when there are major storms,
vandalism, or foot traffic. In rainy areas of the Pacific Northwest,
notes Bensimon, plantseven treespromptly germinate
on roofs where natural debris has been allowed to accumulate.
He recommends
the following roof-maintenance strategies: limit roof access to
key personnel, and hold them accountable for maintenance; provide
access-control systems to keep track of who is going onto the
roof; standardize roof systems and materials within a campus to
facilitate training in maintenance, repairs, and quality assurance;
supply maintenance personnel with repair kits and complete information,
and train them to observe and document roof conditions; implement
a seasonal maintenance strategy to allow for winter preparation,
spring cleanup, and documentation of items for summer maintenance
and repair. 
|