|
By Sara Hart
Ronald Krueck, FAIA, and Sexton, both
alumni of IIT, were well aware that the starkness of Miess
work does not equate to simplicity, nor was his bias in favor
of off-the-shelf components suggest a generic architectural
vocabulary. They were ready to preserve and protect every
detail, adjacency, span, and material. Still, it takes a lot
of research and study to restore almost nothing.
The architects were fortunate to have the services of preservation
consultant Gunny Harboe, AIA, of Austin AECOM (formerly McClier).
The scope of work was extensive: The
sandblast removal of all lead-based paint from interior and
exterior steel and repairs to the members that had rusted.
The steel hadnt been repainted in 25 years, so the dense
Miesian black from photographs had faded to a
dull gray. The glass panels did not conform to any code, so
they had to be replaced, and the steel stops redesigned. The
process also involved refurbishment and reactivation of the
blinds, disassembling and retrofitting them with electromagnetic
release hardware, and refurbishing the original Ellison stainless-steel
doors on the north and south facades. Finally, the $3.6 million
renovation included upgrading the bathrooms to meet current
ADA accessibility standards.
| click
images to view them larger |
 |
 |
 |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
| Steel
corrosion was extensive. The repair cycle
included sandblasting, inspection, more sandblasting,
and repair. Steel conducted moisture along
the base causing condensation in the winter.
When the paint is damaged by moisture and
exposes the steel to the elements, the steel
rusts and forms a red dust (1 & 2). Corrosion
pits form, which produce just enough pressure
in the stop to crack the glass (2 & 3). |
|
|
Obviously, the restoration didnt
actually take place in 15 weeks, as the closing ceremony pronouncements
suggested. Assessment of the existing conditions, study of
Miess details, and the final design solution evolved
over a two-year period. The actual demolition and construction
lasted 15 weeks, but when the symbolic shattering took place,
every beam, frame, and pane of glass was already fabricated
and waiting for assembly nearby. The planning process was
methodical, and the execution surgically precise. Much of
the credit for this goes to Clune Construction Company, whose
scheduling and coordination of the demolition, repair, and
reconstruction sequences included a contingency plan for dealing
with and solving unforeseen problems while staying on schedule.
| click
images to view them larger |
 |
 |
 |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
| Steel
corrosion was extensive. The repair cycle
included sandblasting, inspection, more sandblasting,
and repair. Steel conducted moisture along
the base causing condensation in the winter.
When the paint is damaged by moisture and
exposes the steel to the elements, the steel
rusts and forms a red dust (1 & 2). Corrosion
pits form, which produce just enough pressure
in the stop to crack the glass (2 & 3). |
|
|
The first task was to quickly shroud
the entire building in order to contain dust from the lead-based
paint that was to be sandblasted off all the steel members.
We divided the building into quadrants, explained
Michael A. Tenuta, senior vice president of Clune Construction.
Sandblasting the steel was followed by an inspection,
then more sandblasting, then repairs, then another inspection,
then the first of three coats of paint. There was no float
time, and there was a constantly roving punch list.
|