|
Advertising supplement provided by
The Council of American Structural Engineers, in conjunction
with The American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc.
The CASE committees vision was that with time organizations
representing other design professionals would adopt a similar
methodology and/or guidelines. However, in the meantime the
principles and concepts within the CASE 962D document can
be applied to each discipline in their development of a quality
management plan.
Specifically, the project architect can aid the process of
developing well coordinated and complete construction documents
in the following ways.
First, the architect should
establish a firm specific quality management plan, modified
to suit the specific project and encourage the design team
to do likewise.
Second, the project architect
should select design team members, including the Structural
Engineer of Record (SER), who will perform their services
within the scope of a quality management plan. In the case
of the SER, the project specific quality management plan should
reflect the CASE 962D guidelines. Also, the project architect
should recognize that additional fees may be justifiable for
the SER and other consultants due to the higher level of effort
in coordinating and preparing complete structural construction
plans.
Third, in the initial meetings
with the project owner or developer, a clear presentation
must be made emphasizing the benefits that will accrue to
the project when special effort is made to develop well coordinated
and complete construction documents. These benefits include
more accurate bids, fewer project delays and a reduced number
of requests for extras. Care must be taken by the project
architect to distinguish between the assumption by the owner/developer
that well coordinated and complete documents are typical on
every project, while the current reality is that on most projects
an adequate budget is not available to promote good team communication
and an effective quality assurance plan for document preparation.
|