|
Advertising supplement provided The
Window & Door Manufacturers Association
Positive Pressure
Fire Doors Positive Pressure fire door test
criteria continue to be adopted by states and municipalities
across the U.S. To meet requirements, openings typically require
an intumescent seal or gasket applied either to the frame
or concealed within the door itself. Understanding positive
pressure requirements and communicating them to the door manufacturer
is crucial in meeting code requirements. I.S.1A explains the
mechanics of positive pressure and uses a new door construction
identifier (PP) to help clarify specification.
 |
 |
Left: Architectural
wood flush doors are appropriately characterized
in the standard according to use. Source:
Eggers Industries, Neenah, Wis.
Right: Architectural wood flush doors are
covered under a newly revised performance
standard. Source: Algoma Hardwoods, Algoma,
Wis. |
|
|
One of the most recent developments with
regards to fire doors has been the changeover to positive
pressure testing versus neutral testing methods. An issue
literally years in discussion, this technical and scientific
debate has subsided, and positive pressure is quickly becoming
the standard method of testing required by major building
code bodies coast to coast. Some 40 or so states (or major
cities within those states) have adopted or soon will either
adopt the Uniform Building Codes 7-2 1977 or the International
Building Code 2000 or 2003. (See related story on these pages
for key phrases used in determining the exact nature [positive
or neutral pressure] of fire doors.)
Specification
Checklist Wood flush door guide specifications
vary, but there are certain aspects that must be addressed
to ensure that the doors meet the requirements of the specifier
and building owner. I.S.1A includes a specification checklist,
providing a reference to make sure all key points are addressed.
(See the Guide Specifications Checklist included on these
pages.)
The new WDMA I.S. 1A door standard also
contains a totally updated pre-finishing section that helps
clarify the different types of finishing systems that are
available and their performance characteristics. In the past,
standards detailed 16 different systems most of which are
not typically utilized in the finishing of architectural and
commercial wood doors. While identifying all 16 systems, the
new standard focuses on the three systems that are typically
used in the industry. Those highlights include:
Factory Finishing
Most architectural and commercial wood doors are now
specified to be pre-finished at the factory, prior to delivery
at a jobsite. State- of-the-art equipment operated in controlled
conditions result in the best possible appearance. The raw
wood doors are prepared in automated sanding equipment, removing
scuffs, scratches, and handling marks before the application
of stain and clear top coats. Field finishing cannot duplicate
the conditions and results.
Samples that represent the color, build,
and sheen are supplied to a door manufacturer who matches
the sample and submits it for approval to the specifier. Upon
approval, the door manufacturer then applies the stains and
finishes that duplicate the appearance of the sample submitted.
The process of sample generation and approval typically takes
five to 10 days.
|