comment

2008 Revenues of RECORD’s Top 250 Firms

June 2009

[ Page 2 of 5 ]

By Charles Linn, FAIA

“Recession? What recession?” If Rip Van Winkle, AIA, awoke today with no knowledge of the near collapse of the economy last year, and he decided to start catching up on news of the profession by checking architectural record’s Top 250 Firms list, he might be skeptical of the rumors that we’re in one. Those architects who have not been sleeping much lately might also think he was delusional unless they just looked at the total architecture revenue for all firms on the list. Last year, it gained nearly 9 percent over 2007, going from a total of $11.5 billion to $12.5 billion. Although in most industries 9 percent growth would cause the spontaneous consumption of copious cases of champagne, the extent that individual architecture firms are unique makes it simplistic to assess the overall health of the profession by just totaling up all revenues across the board.

The trouble is that the recession never hits all firms equally. Those that rely too much on housing, commercial, and hospitality work (if you don’t know who you are, check below) got hit hard in the back of the head this year, and their pain was swift and severe. Headaches for architects who work in the hospital and education markets may have been more psychosomatic than not so far, but few were spared them.

Other misdiagnoses arise from the fact that the profession’s perceptions of how we’re doing have become distorted by year-after-year double-digit growth. Revenues for 2007 were a ridiculous 25 percent higher than they were in 2006. This is obviously unsustainable, and nearly all of the profession’s elder statesmen knew it. They just didn’t know exactly when the party would be over. Now the few who stopped expanding while work was still coming in have gone from being derided as paranoid to lauded as prophetic.

In fact, the worst may not be over, so don’t give all the aspirin to your developer and banker friends just yet. Bad news from the AIA’s Architectural Billings Index has abated only slightly in recent months, and the pressure on firms that do institutional work is building. In these markets, the suffering comes on more like a migraine: The blinding pain builds slowly, gaining relief is quite complicated — and it takes a very long time, too.

 

HOW TO USE THIS TABLE

Companies are ranked according to revenue for architectural services performed in 2008 in $ millions. Firms engaged in the business of architectural design that responded to Engineering News-Record’s annual Top 500 Design Firms survey submitted these revenue figures.

To participate in the ENR survey, which serves as the basis for this ranking next year, contact Virgilio Mendoza at 212/904-6371.

Key to how firms classify themselves:

A = Architect
AE = Architect-Engineer
AEC = Architect-Engineer-Contractor
EA = Engineer-Architect
Other combinations possible

 


Top 250 Firms: 1-50 | 51-100 | 101-150 | 151-200 | 201- 250

 

ARCHITECTURE FIRMS RANKED ACCORDING TO 2008 REVENUE
Rank Firms listed by 2008 architecture revenue as reported to ENR in its Top 500 Design Firms Survey Type of Firm Total Architectural Revenue Domestic Architectural Revenue International Architectural Revenue Percent of Design Revenue from Architecture Total Design Revenue
51 Martin Associates Group Inc. Los Angeles, Calif. E 56.00 56.00 0.00 88% 63.94
52 Fentress Architects Denver, Colo. A 55.61 55.15 0.46 100% 55.61
53 KlingStubbins Philadelphia, Pa. AEP 54.90 44.50 10.40 55% 100.00
54 Heery International Inc. Atlanta, Ga. AE 54.10 54.10 0.00 88% 61.44
55 Clark-Nexsen PC Norfolk, Va. AE 53.60 53.60 0.00 82% 65.30
56 BBG-BBGM New York, N.Y. A 53.00 41.00 12.00 100% 53.00
57 Payette Boston, Mass. A 52.28 45.63 6.65 100% 52.28
58 Anshen+Allen Architects San Francisco, Calif. A 51.90 41.78 10.12 64% 80.77
59 VOA Associates Inc. Chicago, Ill. A 51.60 47.00 4.60 100% 51.60
60 Cubellis Inc. Boston, Mass. AE 51.00 46.00 5.00 80% 64.00
61 Davis Brody Bond Aedas New York, N.Y. A 49.64 47.58 2.06 100% 49.64
62 Swanke Hayden Connell Architects New York, N.Y. A 49.50 25.20 24.30 100% 49.50
63 NTD Architecture San Diego, Calif. A 49.20 49.20 0.00 100% 49.20
64 PGAL Houston, Texas AE 48.40 47.90 0.50 83% 58.50
65 EwingCole Philadelphia, Pa. AE 48.10 47.00 1.10 60% 80.10
66 WHR Architects Inc. Houston, Texas AE 48.08 47.36 0.72 100% 48.08
67 FXFOWLE New York, N.Y. A 47.60 37.30 10.30 100% 47.60
68 Sasaki Associates Inc. Watertown, Mass. A 47.50 43.20 4.30 64% 73.90
69 Stantec Inc. Irvine, Calif. EAL 46.30 46.30 0.00 7% 630.40
70 Dewberry Fairfax, Va. EA 46.06 46.06 0.00 13% 344.46
71 Polshek Partnership Architects LLP New York, N.Y. A 45.68 45.68 0.00 100% 45.68
72 Murphy/Jahn Chicago, Ill. A 45.40 2.60 42.80 88% 51.70
73 CBT Architects Boston, Mass. A 45.39 42.35 3.04 100% 45.39
74 JCJ Architecture Hartford, Conn. A 45.10 44.80 0.30 100% 45.10
75 Morris Architects Houston, Texas A 45.05 42.57 2.48 100% 45.05
76 Beyer Blinder Belle Architects & Planners LLP New York, N.Y. A 44.56 43.49 1.07 100% 44.56
77 OZ Architecture Boulder, Colo. A 44.20 43.50 0.70 100% 44.20
78 Perkowitz + Ruth Architects Long Beach, Calif. A 44.00 43.43 0.57 100% 44.00
79 OWP/P Chicago, Ill. AE 43.60 41.30 2.30 87% 50.30
80 Tsoi/Kobus & Associates Inc. Cambridge, Mass. A 43.00 43.00 0.00 100% 43.00
81 Michael Baker Corp. Moon Twp., Pa. EA 42.60 39.60 3.00 11% 385.50
82 Steelman Partners Las Vegas, Nev. A 41.00 23.00 18.00 100% 41.00
83 KTGY Group Inc. Irvine, Calif. A 40.42 38.34 2.08 100% 40.42
84 BLT Architects Philadelphia, Pa. A 40.00 40.00 0.00 100% 40.00
85 HLW International LLP New York, N.Y. AE 40.00 35.00 5.00 82% 49.00
86 FRCH Design Worldwide Cincinnati, Ohio E 38.60 31.00 7.60 100% 38.60
87 The S/L/A/M Collaborative Glastonbury, Conn. A 38.19 38.19 0.00 100% 38.19
88 Pei Cobb Freed & Partners Architects LLP New York, N.Y. A 37.48 31.76 5.72 100% 37.48
89 Shepley Bulfinch Richardson and Abbott Boston, Mass. A 36.60 36.30 0.30 100% 36.60
90 CO Architects Los Angeles, Calif. A 35.77 35.77 0.00 100% 35.77
91 Solomon Cordwell Buenz Chicago, Ill. A 35.20 33.50 1.70 100% 35.20
92 The Benham Cos. LLC Oklahoma City, Okla. EAC 34.64 33.93 1.71 29% 118.82
93 Niles Bolton Associates Inc. Atlanta, Ga. A 34.50 34.10 0.40 100% 34.50
94 Kahler Slater Inc. Milwaukee, Wis. A 34.44 34.39 0.05 100% 34.44
95 Little Diversified Architectural Consultants Charlotte, N.C. AE 34.30 34.05 0.25 82% 42.00
96 Lionakis Sacramento, Calif. AE 33.74 33.74 0.00 82% 41.15
97 The PBSJ Corp. Tampa, Fla. EA 33.67 33.67 0.00 6% 594.28
98 Kirksey Houston, Texas A 32.74 32.74 0.00 100% 32.74
99 Harley Ellis Devereaux Southfield, Mich. AE 32.21 32.21 0 51% 63.15
100 gkkworks Irvine, Calif. A 32.20 32.20 0.00 100% 32.20

 


Top 250 Firms: 1-50 | 51-100 | 101-150 | 151-200 | 201- 250

 

 

Rate this project:
Based on what you have seen and read about this project, how would you grade it? Use the stars below to indicate your assessment, five stars being the highest rating.
----- Advertising -----

 

[ Page 2 of 5 ]

 Reader Comments:

Sign in to Comment

To write a comment about this story, please sign in. If this is your first time commenting on this site, you will be required to fill out a brief registration form. Your public username will be the beginning of the email address that you enter into the form (everything before the @ symbol). Other than that, none of the information that you enter will be publically displayed.

We welcome comments from all points of view. Off-topic or abusive comments, however, will be removed at the editors’ discretion.