|
Interviewed
by Leslie Yudell

Photographs © Louis
Kahn Project; Harriet Pattison (left and middle)
Filmmaker Nathaniel Kahns
most recent project, My Architect, is a feature-length documentary
about his father, the architect Louis I. Kahn. Conceived as
a journey of filial discovery, it is both a moving tribute
to a great artist and a candid portrait of a complex, elusive
man. The film premiered last March at the 32nd New Directors
New Films festival in New York City and is being distributed
theatrically in the U.S. by New Yorker Films; it will open
at the Film Forum in New York on November 12 (for more information,
including a schedule of screenings around the country, go
to www.myarchitectfilm.com).
Q: What
did you learn about your dad from making this film?
My father died when I was 11. My early
vision of him was based on my experience as a little boy and
was very limited. I remember a warm and loving man, but I
also knew he had a bigger world, from the amazing stories
he told me about it: of India and Bangladesh, of tigers, of
people who built buildings carrying baskets on their heads.
For a child, it was intoxicating. But in making my film, I
discovered much that I didnt know beforeabout
his struggle, his persistence, his conflicts, his achievements.
He went from being a mythological character to being a man.
Your dad had a very unconventional
personal life, which he kept secret. Do you have any misgivings
about revealing it?
My film shows that I have great respect
for my father, but I also have questions about the choices
he made.
I tried not to judge him. As he said,
You can be critical of someone, but you should never
judge them. My father was a great mystery, and I didnt
want to dispel that but to examine it. Thats why I designed
the film as a journey: You end up with a multifaceted impression
of Lou Kahn that preserves his complexity.
What were the challenges of filming
your dads buildings?
The big challenge was, how do you get
the emotional power of these buildings into a movie? I found
its not by filming good angles, but by moving through
the space of the buildings with people who had a real connection
to Lou, using the buildings as dramatic settings. And you
have to be willing to wait for a building; you cant
just show up one day and say, Were going to do
Kimbell today. I went to the site and stayed for a while,
then captured the buildings in different conditions. I used
time-lapse photography to show how the buildings changed over
time.
Which building do you admire most?
They are all equally interesting, and
in different ways. In filming, each required a very specific
situation; we had to search for solutions to convey the character
of each one. This revealed to me how much depth of imagination
went into their design. They really kept me on my toes as
a filmmaker. I was also surprised by how the buildings seem
both big and small at the same time. Lou Kahns sense
of scale is astonishing and mysterious. I felt it was essential
to capture this: How do you make something feel both monumental
and intimate? I hope we succeeded.
|