subscribe
e-newsletter
contact us
advertise
from our archive
Features   Green
Off the Record: Recent Blog Posts
The blog written by the staff of Architectural Record
View all blog posts >>
Recently Posted Reader Photos

View all photo galleries >>
Reader Commented / Recommended
Most Commented Most Recommended
Rankings reflect comments made in the past 14 days
Rankings reflect votes made in the past 14 days


Drain It Right: Wetlands for Managing Runoff
[ Page 2 of 5 ]
Managing stormwater runoff with detention ponds is like trying to lose weight by taking diet pills: long-term consequences outweigh short-term benefits. Natural systems such as wetlands do the job better, more beautifully, and more responsibly.
By Deborah Snoonian, P.E.

Obeying nature’s ways

The design of constructed wetlands are the purview of specialized consultants (see “Doing It the Natural Way,” page 129), who work with architects and landscape architects during the early phases of a project, generally during design development. Their first task is to calculate the “water budget”—not a dollar figure, but the amount of runoff that will leave the site. These calculations are usually made using a worst-case scenario of a storm of known intensity and duration. Next, the size and configuration of the wetland are determined, and its location chosen based on the site’s topography and overall plan.

The more paved or hard surfaces a building site has, the more runoff it will generate. Since wetlands rely on natural treatment techniques, using them may require changes in the site plan to ensure they function properly. “The first flush of stormwater runoff is usually highest in pollutants,” says Georganna Collins, a wetland scientist with Turner Collie & Braden, an environmental planning firm in Houston. “An overly high flow or a high dose of pollutants will kill the plants that treat runoff.” To reduce the chance of shocking the system, experts often recommend using vegetated swales or filter strips upstream of a constructed wetland. These features serve to reduce and pretreat runoff.

 

Doing it the natural way: A wetlands expert spells out the benefits

Can you design a runoff treatment system using Mother Nature’s ingenuity? The answer is yes—specialized consultants provide these services. record asked Wendi Goldsmith, a certified stormwater quality specialist and president of the Bioengineering Group in Salem, Mass., to explain how it’s done and why it’s important. Goldsmith’s firm designs natural runoff-management solutions and provides technical and policy guidance to the EPA on a variety of stormwater issues.

Trained as a geologist, soil scientist, and landscape designer, Goldsmith has an unerring grasp of wetland and watershed science, and she’s an avid proponent of making developed sites operate as ecosystems. “A landscape isn’t just a pretty place,” she says. “It has forms and functions that make it work a certain way to control flooding naturally and rid water of pollutants. When we pave over the landscape, it loses these functions. Where water goes and doesn’t go, what it comes into contact with as it flows, how long it takes to move from a pipe to a natural body of water—all these have an effect on water quality.” If landscapes were allowed to work the way nature intended, she says, we’d have no need for storm sewers or detention ponds.

Using land treatment is a relatively new concept in the U.S. Before the 1960s, stormwater management meant draining city streets as quickly as possible to prevent flooding, and channeling the runoff to the nearest body of water. The result was ever-larger networks of storm sewers, as urbanization increased to accommodate population growth. When building these networks became too expensive, engineers began using detention ponds to hold runoff before letting it drain to waterways. “We spent a lot of money building and now maintaining a system for water management which Mother Nature was taking care of beforehand,” Goldsmith says. Finally, in the 1970s, the scientific community recognized that not only were these practices only marginally effective in preventing flooding, they were also causing significant environmental damage. With the EPA’s enactment of the Phase II stormwater rules in December 1999, the problem has garnered an unprecedented level of national attention. The Phase II laws require virtually all developed sites to manage runoff more responsibly. “Every architect and builder needs to have at least a rudimentary understanding of stormwater issues now,” she notes.

Runoff management should focus on reducing flow and creating landscapes whose hydrology mimics that of natural systems. This means roughly 50 percent of precipitation leaves the site through evapotranspiration (a combination of evaporation and respiration through the leaves of plants), and about 45 percent seeps through soil into groundwater, with no more than 5 percent leaving as runoff. Sustainable watershed hydrology happens naturally in forested and vegetated lands, which Goldsmith calls “multifunctional, self-maintaining, solar-operated water quality treatment systems.”

When a constructed wetland is part of a site plan, design parameters such as size and depth are determined based on the site characteristics (area drained, soil type, amount of paved versus unpaved surfaces) and based on the volume of runoff expected in certain weather conditions. But they aren’t the sole solution to every runoff problem. Nor do sites have to be entirely covered with vegetation to operate as healthy ecosystems. Goldsmith is a pragmatist. She acknowledges that development will happen, that conventional paving materials and construction methods aren’t going away any time soon, and she’s quick to point out the variety of techniques that can be used to achieve the right balance. “The best way to manage runoff is to use every square foot of a site wisely,” she says. “Green roofs [roofs planted with vegetation] are an excellent way to capture and hold runoff from a rooftop. Porous pavements allow parking lot runoff to percolate through the soil. Water can be captured in underground filtration beds and allowed to trickle back into the ground, or caught in roof cisterns and used for on-site irrigation.”

Balance is the operative principle here; unfortunately, urbanization has tipped the scales toward one-dimensional, engineered quick fixes. Goldsmith, whose passion to protect watersheds is clearly articulated in both her words and her firm’s work, is glad that regulations and a general heightened awareness of environmental issues is turning the tide against the status quo. “The minute you let water enter a piping system,” she muses, “you’ve basically lost the opportunity to treat it.” DS

[ Page 2 of 5 ]
Special Subscription Offer: Get Architectural Record Digital Free!
© 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
All Rights Reserved