|
By Alan Joch
Early collaboration also addresses the importance technology
holds for clients. This was the case when Atlanta firm Thompson,
Ventulett, Stainback and Associates designed the Georgia Institute
of Technologys Technology Square campus. The telecom
and A/V components were such major pieces of the clients
vision, we wanted a consultant that could [make sure] we werent
short on something that would make [the project] look weak,
says Maria Bonau, AIA, associate principal.
Sophisticated voice, data, and video communications were
necessary because the multibuilding Technology Square project
extended the main campus of Georgia Tech across an interstate
highway. The architect specified fiber-optic cabling to join
the new buildings to the old, to link the classrooms together,
and to provide continuing- and distance-education capabilities
for the new campus. The president wanted to make a statement:
As we move into this new century, technology is an important
element and Georgia Tech is leading the charge, Bonau
says. Its also been a moneymaker for the university,
which rents out its electronic classrooms to corporations
and other groups for training, conferences, and the like.
Consultants can also help architects see into the future.
New York architects Kohn Pedersen Fox (KPF) recently designed
a new facility, Jon M. Huntsman Hall, at the Wharton School
at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. From
an A/V point of view, we tried to look at what technologies
they would be using on Day 1, Day 2, and Day 3, recalls
David Ottavio, KPF associate principal. Then we created
a framework for the [technology] infrastructure, including
a tremendous telecom backbone to run data cabling so
future upgrades wouldnt be as costly. He calls this
technique future proofing. With the help of consulting
firm Shen Milsom & Wilke of New York City, the architects
designed hardware closets positioned in accessible locations
for easy repairs and upgrades, and opted for removable ceiling
panels that gave technicians easy access to internal cabling.
Otherwise, [Wharton] would be tearing walls apart,
Ottavio says.
Communications breakdown
Blending beauty and function is, as always, the trickiest
balance. We put performance above aesthetics, while
architects [do] the opposite, consultant McCann admits,
saying material selection is often a bone of contention. Architects
love glass conference rooms because they look techy. But theyre
the worst thing [for] videoconferencing. There are no acoustic
[insulation] properties in glass, the sound is hard, and it
reflects around the room. You end up creating little echo
chambersnot the intended result.
McCann suggests holding brainstorming sessions to identify
solutions before the client sees design proposals, so the
team forms a united front. Once a project is done, informal
meetings can also help design teams build on experience to
avoid past mistakes. Says DataVoxs Ritchken, On
big projects, there are no heroes. You either look great as
a team or bad as a team.
|